tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666195730630249633.post2899647050889926027..comments2024-03-25T17:49:41.408-07:00Comments on Salem Breakfast on Bikes: Consider the Penalty of Free Parking as Employer TaxSalem Breakfast on Bikeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15618055627843335993noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666195730630249633.post-52095536678692705862015-10-05T20:06:29.415-07:002015-10-05T20:06:29.415-07:00I live in Keizer, and I have taken the bus both ti...I live in Keizer, and I have taken the bus both times I've been to the S Commercial Ventis . I won't ride my bicycle in that area (mind you, I ride to Fairview Industrial 5 days a week), and would be likely to visit more if I could go on weekends. You are right about the area being unwalkable and unbicyclable, which is what makes Cherriots of particular value...especially to businesses along the #1 route. Perhaps instead of rationalizing, it is time to test: start asking customers IF they use transit, or if they ever would.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666195730630249633.post-4194382949450402812015-10-05T08:48:33.110-07:002015-10-05T08:48:33.110-07:00I'm most struck by the business community'...I'm most struck by the business community's (read: Salem Chamber of Commerce) support for the third bridge and their opposition to the payroll tax. To me, it simply exposes them for what they are: a special interest. And as a special interest, everything they say should be taken with a grain of salt. But in Salem, the people in charge seem to take everything they say as the Truth.<br><br>Supporting the third bridge means support for a project that would cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $500 million. And that money would come from several taxes, including property taxes. Yet apparently to the Chamber, those taxes will spur growth that will more than make up for the $20 million or more that it will take each year to service the debt on the third bridge. But $5 million a year in payroll tax? It will kill jobs and kill the economy! To me, their mixed messages don't add up. They want us to believe that a giant infrastructure project designed to steer traffic through Salem will somehow benefit us all, yet a modest payroll tax will destroy our small businesses.<br><br>I'm all for better understanding the pros and cons to the payroll tax, but I'm wary when the cons are coming from the Chamber especially given their stance on the third bridge. It reminds me a bit of the United States Chamber of Commerce messages during the Obama administration. Every policy introduced by Obama, particularly the Affordable Care Act, is going to kill jobs! And the evidence just hasn't shown up. But their fear mongering about the effect of taxes on the overall economy just continues. And the Salem Chamber seems to use the same playbook.Jeff Schumacherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08320652216233151117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5666195730630249633.post-31655116773786182492015-10-04T20:01:51.278-07:002015-10-04T20:01:51.278-07:00I agree with the basic thrust of your analysis but...I agree with the basic thrust of your analysis but on this particular issue I think it misses the most important point. This is a moral issue about allowing the least fortunate (the transit dependent) to fully participate in civic life in Salem.<br /><br />There is no sound business reason (at least in the short term) for Ventis to support expanded transit service. Because of Salem's long term planning failures, this location is a repulsive environment for walking and biking and none of their customers or employees are likely to expose themselves to it by taking transit. Weekend and evening service won't change that. Their business is completely dependent on parking for the rest of their lives. Commercial will never be a walkable place in our lifetime.<br /><br />In my view, because of the crappiness of the built environment in Salem, transit only serves the least fortunate that are dependent on it. That makes it a moral issue. Are we going to give these folks the chance to participate in civic life or not? Are we going to give them the chance to improve their situation or not? Those are the questions Ventis should be asking.<br /><br />The only business reason for them to support expanded transit is that it would enable higher density, more walkable development patterns that will lead to increased opportunities to expand their business in the long term. But Salem won't have anything like that in our lifetimes.<br /><br />I'm more interested in what a business like Straight From NY Pizza might have to say. They have 3 locations in Salem and 2 in Portland. The .07% payroll tax for Trimet did not deter them from expanding there. Or maybe Exit Real World? They had stores in Salem and Portland. They paid .07% on their payroll in Portland and paid 0% on the Salem location but they were able to keep the Portland location open and closed the Salem location. Or Holiday Retirement? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com