Before the City could be zoned in 1926, there was drama.
On June 21st in 1926, all of the Planning and Zoning Commission resigned:
the resignations declared that the "comprehensive bridge program," and activities formerly planned had become impossible following the refusing of the public on May 21 to grant $15,000 for expenses and expert engineer service.
In some of April and throughout May there had been lots of press and discussion about zoning and planning. In April
Council had taken the Commission's request for funding and referred it to the voters. Some wanted a "do not pass" recommendation even. Passage was never a sure thing.
A Letter to the Editor on May 19th explicitly talked about the values of a walkable neighborhood, the threat to the corner store, and the centralizing tendencies of zoning. (The writer also wanted a nearby garage and filling station. We may return to it, as an example of transition.)
The issue the previous day, on the 18th, had several articles in discussion.
On the election of Friday, May 21st there were four funding items on the ballot:
- A tax levy to provide $5000/year for three years to fund the Zoning Commission's work.
- $30,000 in bonds for a fire truck and other fire equipment.
- A tax levy to provide about $30,000/year for bridge construction and maintenance.
- A tax levy to provide about $22,000/year for street work.
The Election season was strange by our modern standards. There had been a separate school election for the purchase of the future Leslie Junior High School just a couple of days earlier on Wednesday the 19th. Of the four on that Friday, only the fire department bond measure passed.
But less than the politics of the proposed tax levies themselves, it's the underlying planning matters that remain interesting today.