data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64e29/64e29346e032e8570bc516418febd7cd067587a3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd31f/dd31f76fecc34eaec892f1a584a513ee3d13bb2a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f05f/6f05fa29963af193004440e59cbd4098c2f23c42" alt=""
But what about bicyclists? The arrow directs them south, straight-ahead.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bf2c/1bf2c6a370613ad6b38aa55ef79aa0cb730e9cf1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a0ed/8a0ed637e74c08ec337e52d47d097ee3af81218a" alt=""
What's a bicyclist to do?
If you are making a right-hand turn onto Mission going west, the bike lane is unhelpful. You must stay in the auto lane, either to take the lane or to stay right.
If you are going south, straight into Bush Park, the bike lane is good and bad. On the one hand, the bike lane protects you from a right hook. This is good. On the other hand, the bike lane makes for a crooked move through the intersection and a more oblique angle into the curb cut to enter the park. Once you get onto the sidewalk, you have to execute an immediate 90 degree turn in a confined space, a space you might be sharing with pedestrians. It may be necessary to dismount and walk the bike.
If you are making a left-hand turn onto Mission going east, the bike lane is most useful. Then it positions you to the right of similarly turning autos, keeps you on the outside of the turn, and positions you to take the lane on Mission or move to the right.
So in one case the lane is useless, in one case it is only partially useful, and only in the third case is it unambiguously useful - call it 50% effective? For the main movement through the intersection, straight north or south, the combination of right-angles, mis-aligned curb cuts, and dead-end bike lane makes for confusion and difficulty. It is not a helpful guide to someone who doesn't already have a plan. This intersection is a barrier and needs to be re-engineered.
Church Street going south offers a similar conundrum.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7e1e/d7e1efd49a8f0f1df3a8947989844f6f7f46806c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db1a/3db1a4115bd478bb5d29b53896e0f0413bf675b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b453/7b453de1ea9403a5776965624d49c7d4caccbff3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a835/2a835f2935bcee43bcb35a9cf0b1e51be52e1a32" alt=""
(Image: Bush House from the Salem Public Library, Oregon Historic Photograph Collections.)
For bicyclists on Church who wish to continue south through Bush Park, the entry is difficult and mis-aligned. Here, the stone wall is a literal barrier.
Because Commercial/Liberty and 12th/13th couplets are very busy, and even High street is too busy (even though it's signed for "local traffic only," some call it the "High street by-pass") for many bicyclists, Bush Park is an important N-S connection for bicyclists. The edge conditions on Mission street make for problematic connections to Winter and Church streets. Bush Park is a bit of a black hole for bicyclists, and in a second post, we'll look at its west, south, and east edges.
1 comment:
I love these bike-lane-analysis posts you've been doing. Keep up the good work!
Post a Comment