data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84e62/84e622d3a95ed892b677417f83dd641d675f643c" alt=""
But it doesn't have to be this way. If cars themselves are useful transportation tools, they should also be part of a toolbox or a menu of mobility choices. Unfortunately, most people don't feel they have a range of choices.
Without being at all explicitly about it, our commitment to car monoculture and parking is all over Monday's Council agenda.
But first a note about a retirement. Director of Urban Development Rick Scott retired on Friday, and his group was responsible for the Union Street Railroad Bridge project. Thanks, Rick, and happy retirement!
Agenda Items
An interesting note about changing the procurement process for the downtown Economic Improvement District. Currently Go Downtown Salem administers the EID. Their contract is up for renewal and it is being opened to competitive bids. City staff feel that the "request for proposal" process will be inadequate and recommend changing to a "special procurement process."
I really have no idea what the change in process would mean, but since downtown connectivity and mobility choice is critical to bicycling in Salem, the EID renewal process is worth paying attention to.
Western Oregon University was interested in having a small campus in the development, and with Chemeketa's CCBI kitty-corner that would create a neat cluster of higher education along the Union Street corridor. The density fits with the opportunity to continue to reshape Union Street as a bicycle boulevard; but also threatens to revert to more of the same auto-oriented development. In any event, as you might expect, the economy has stalled the development. The development team is the same one behind the Rivers condos, and the city's packet contains an interesting letter from them.
The DEQ is requiring additional environmental remediation on Minto-Brown Island, and the easement on Minto-Brown for the Riverfront-Minto bridge needs to be modified slightly.
It's amazing how many of the goals actually relate to car parking. It's sad how much land and how many resources we apply inefficiently to the subsidy of storing cars between trips.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64a7f/64a7f2fa917c4b1d6454c129b06c7fa8b3b2c07b" alt=""
1 comment:
Re: parking. What's your hunch, Eric? Are downtown businesses requesting more parking? I find it difficult to believe that businesses still don't see the benefit in ensuring a variety of transportation options to their doorstep. Are Salem active transportation voices just not heard enough (or at all) by our local reps? It seems to me we have plenty of space for parking. In my opinion, Salem does not use what they have very efficiently.
Post a Comment