The new system's pain in the butt! It may offer a mechanism to publish staff reports and other items in a more timely way, but it also requires additional steps and makes scanning and screening (in the sense of the light reading of documents to determine whether they merit more detailed reading) agenda items more difficult.
It may, in fact, actually make it easier to bury controversial items in hopes they will be overlooked.
The regular overview here will evolve some, and depending on how closely you read, you may find some tinkering and awkwardness.
Here is the Council agenda proper, the Urban Renewal Agency agenda, and the Housing Authority agenda. The old wall-of-text was hard to read, but it was convenient to have all three on one page. This approach looks better logically and seems more organized, but it is less convenient for citizens who want a synoptic overview.
One new feature seems to be that the new format for Staff Reports has already been changed. At first I thought the Reports had disappeared!
But it turns out they may no longer be published as a pdf and instead are some form of html text.
You have to click on the "text" subtab to find the Staff Report in html rather than a pdf. Hopefully that will make searching easier! But hiding behind the tab labeled "text" is not very helpful - that's a little "secret handshake" in spirit.
|12th Street at the Clark Creek Bridge and Culvert|
Between Hoyt and McGilchrist the sidewalk disappears
the new construction is on the left, just past the bridge railings
Anyway, the matter at Council is an intergovernmental agreement with ODOT that formally authorizes the City to acquire new right-of-way, which because of the Federal funding for the project was something ODOT only was apparently authorized to do. (Seems like this is an instance of annoying red tape!)
on the agenda. The rate will be $147.18 per stall.
This will yield $476,580. The total expenses for the downtown parking district are budgeted to be $1,912,970.
The projected revenue, including $734,720 carried forward, is $2,162,970, leaving a $250,000 contingency.
Direct revenue from this year's parking tax and parking permit fees is only about half of the budget this year.
the total annual budget (URA budget here), but it looks like there's a change proposed and the formal adoption pushed back to June 27th:
The City Council is asked to approve the recommended changes on June 6, 2016, in order to provide sufficient time to prepare the necessary budget resolution by the June 27, 2016 meeting. The resolution will include any changes approved on June 6, 2016. The resolution will also include some additional amendments (see below) that will be presented at the June 27 meeting.I think that's everything of possible interest here, but I'm not sure.
Have you explored the new website? What do you think? Do you see anything else, especially transportation-related, to highlight?