A little worrisome is a potential 2017 goal:
- The pedestrian / bicycle path over Wallace road NW as a way to help traffic flow along Wallace Road
Wallace at Edgewater |
The project, proposed as an alternative to the Second Street undercrossing, may be an answer to the question, "how can we get people on bike and on foot out of the way?" and not an answer to the question, "what do people on foot and on bike need in order to bike and walk more?" The proposal looks to be a pedestrian displacement system more than anything else. [clarification added]
In the notes to the previous meeting they said
[A neighbor] is working on the design for a bicycle/pedestrian bridge beside Highway 22 over Wallace Road NW at the Edgewater intersection. The bridge would provide a connection between the existing bike/pedestrian path from the Marion and Center Street bridges to the path along the south side of Edgewater Street. The Land Use Committee will meet with ODOT representative Sheila Lyons and Ward 1 City Councilor Kara Kaser February 16 and 17 to discuss ways to move this project forward.The problems here:
- The connection across Wallace Road should link to the Union Street Railroad Bridge primarily, and not to the Center Street Bridge.
- The Path along OR-22, tucked in behind the buildings along Edgewater, is isolated and doesn't offer direct connections to any businesses. It's a nice line on a map, but it's not as useful as it could be. A route along Second Street offers much better visibility and connectivity.
- Facilities for people on foot and on bike should not be developed out of what is most helpful for travelers in cars; they should instead develop out of the needs of people on foot and on bike.
- (A footbridge in this location would probably also conflict with the SRC's path, including the OR-22/Marine Drive connection. But that's a different matter.)
A smaller, scaled-down undercrossing plan - Back in November it still seemed on |
In the 2017 goals there's also desire to
- Bring Transit back as a WSNA committee and to encourage better transit in West Salem
Better transit in West Salem isn't just a matter of scheduling (and funding) more buses. It may be that quality transit in West Salem is not possible until the cost of making car trips is more accurately priced, with less or no subsidy, and the trade-offs are on an even playing field. This could mean there are tolls on the bridges or congestion pricing as well as priced parking downtown - things currently many Salemites vehemently oppose.
Archived meeting minutes are here.
They'll also be talking about "granny flats"/ADUs, Marine Drive, flood maps, and Edgewater zoning.
The West Salem Neighborhood Association meets Monday the 20th at 7:00 P.M. in Roth’s West, Mezzanine (1130 Wallace Rd NW).
CANDO
Briefly, in the CANDO minutes (archived here) for last month is a note about
a new memory care and independent living facility being planned for 901 Front Street NE along the Willamette River. The plan calls for the 2-building, 98,000 sf facility, which will require a conditional use permit, to replace warehouses on 3.88 acres and be oriented toward the river. The plan also includes some form of public right of way along the river on the west side of the facility, and from Front Street to the river along Mill Creek. The board was generally receptive to the plan as presented.
901 Front Street right now |
(Also, if you haven't been reading it, they've got an extensive series going on various efforts to work on the constellation of problems around homelessness. Most recently they pivoted from criticism of the Task Force to something much more positive with "Mayor Announces Ambitious Plan for Chronic Homeless." If you have an interest in this topic, this is by far the best analysis on it in any media here.)
CAN-DO meets Tuesday the 21st, at 6:00 p.m. at First Christian Church on 685 Marion Street NE.
2 comments:
I'm confused. Why is a bike/ped bridge over Wallace Road needed if the city is planning an undercrossing at that same location?
This is being proposed as an alternative to the undercrossing, as I read it. Sorry about that. I will revise the text to be clearer.
Post a Comment