But the full story of the final round of ConnectOregon V is considerably more interesting - and more complicated.
Corvallis, not Coal, had the Relevant Loss
First off, there's the funding. It's not just about saying "no" to a coal project. Back in December the Portland Tribune reported on the project list:
Among them was the Port of St. Helens, which sought $2 million for reconstruction of Berth 2 near Clatskanie. Ambre Energy, an Australian company, proposed to match it with $3 million to rebuild the 70-year-old dock for ocean-going ships to carry coal to Asia.That $4 million grew, in part because a sidepath linking Albany and Corvallis also ran into trouble. The letter to the OTC from ODOT says
But a majority of the commission had questions about the project’s readiness, and by a 3-2 vote, dropped it from the list of 37 projects recommended for $42.3 million in funding....
Since the commission acted Aug. 20, an additional $2 million in savings makes possible $4 million more for projects.
In a letter dated February 18, 2015, Benton County formally withdrew the Corvallis to Albany Trail project, making an additional $2 million available and bringing the total remaining from ConnectOregon V to $4.5 million. In addition, $2.45 million is available from savings realized from ConnectOregon I, II, III and IV projects. As a result, the OTC now has $6.95 million to allocate.ODOT staff had advanced a list of projects that included the coal project - it was out, and
So the funding isn't exactly simple. As the letter from ODOT suggests, there are three distinct pots that contributed to this new funding:
- Savings from other projects coming in under budget
- Cancelling the coal terminal
- Cancelling the Albany-Corvallis bike path
As seemed possible earlier this month, with the deleted coal project was already supplying some of the funds, it's really the cancellation of the Albany-Corvallis bike path that is funding the extra portion that enabled the transit center, wait-listed if you will, to slide up into the funding list.
And that's a bummer. And not nearly as much of an "environmental" win as perhaps we all would like.










