On Monday, acting as the Urban Renewal Agency, Council will consider a proposal for a new study on Front Street just north of the Union Street Bridge.
|
Imagining Front Street at Market Street
|
You will recall the recent excitement over the prospect of redeveloping the cannery site on Front at Market Street. (Previous notes here.)
The City proposes to budget $250,000 in unallocated Urban Renewal funding for two studies, $150,000 for a new one on Front Street and $100,000 to update the grocery store study from 2018:
The Front Street multi-modal project encompasses the corridor that will link the Downtown area to the Cannery property project north of the URA. The corridor is impacted by the rail line, a potential trail, a pedestrian bridge over Mill Creek, and bicycle accommodation, which all need to be accounted for during the planning phase and before the developer finalizes plans. The grocery store update is to refresh data from the 2018 analysis in the Riverfront-Downtown URA given increased development completed and underway.
With the railroad, and the desires for housing and for substantial retail and recreation amenities, reconfiguring Front Street will be a challenge - but a worthy one!
That study will probably have a public process and hopefully direct conversation about trade-offs and different notions of balancing all the user types.
It is possible to imagine a lively district there in 2050.
By contrast, it is much harder to imagine a lively district along McGilchrist in 2050.
This is one of the things that hampers discussion of McGilchrist. Certainly in the nearish term, say 2030 or 2033, even with terrific bike lanes and sidewalks, there is not going to be a high volume of people walking or rolling there, even with the brewery district, the Social Security office, and Veterans clinic. Non-auto travel will remain occasional rather than constant. So from that standpoint it may not be the best place for the City to focus on state-of-the-art bike lanes and sidewalks.
Further out, it's harder to imagine conditions on McGilchrist in 2050. Will robot trucks be the main user? Technological change may impact that area more than downtowns, where the basic act of something like eating in a restaurant remains tethered to the forms of our embodied existence.
But even granting that truck and auto traffic will remain primary on McGilchrist, speed remains a concern.
Over on FB, Commissioner Slater posted 15 theses from the meeting, representing the City position. Most of them seem broadly true and accurate, thought it is possible to quibble with some of them on smaller matters of degree and detail. But the whole seems driven by a tone of "Look at how much bigger it could be. Be thankful for the concessions we have already made." The lack of a public conversation about what we want from McGilchrist shows here.
I want to look more closely at two of the theses and to contest them a little, maybe more for future conversations and studies, for the "next time," rather than for McGilchrist itself:
-
The current professional understanding is that it is safer for bikes to cross intersections on the street, which is how this street is designed.
-
The engineer who did the design believes that speeds will average 30-35 mph.
Here is an enlarged detail from the plan at 22nd Street. (Comments in red and pink added.)
|
Eastbound on McGilchrist at 22nd (red and pink comments added)
|
One concern is the set of ramps and transitions between the multi-use path and the short segment of on-street, paint-only bike lane at intersections.