On a hill just south of Hillcrest, there's a great old tree. Most everything has been cleared around it, so it stands out against the sky.
|
I don't think that's an Oak, but it's a presence on the top of the hill;
pasture at bottom by utility poles would be park |
One of the park acquisitions on Council agenda Monday night showed a development that hasn't shown much of itself yet. According to the Staff Report it's had a formal "Urban Growth Decision," which imposed a condition of a park dedication, but that might have been a while ago, and I don't remember seeing any other Hearing Notices more recently (do you?).*
There are no great conclusions to draw here, I don't think. The area is a zone of some of the biggest greenfield developments in town, a large bloc of parcels in transition. Between the projects at 27th and Kuebler by the I-5 interchange, the Fairview projects, and any Hillcrest project, there's a lot of potential here. Even with some of the plans for Fairview very forward-looking, the overall development pattern may still look backwards too much to existing 20th century autoism, however. It's worth keeping an eye on. It is interesting, if nothing else.
It's also, at least until it's developed, a little picturesque! It's too bad the park won't be at the top of the hill instead of the bottom. (Just off the top of my head, I can think of many more parks in low lands along creeks than on properties with a view. It's easier to monetize the latter, so it's not surprising developers sell off the swampy parcels for public use.)
|
Just south of Hillcrest, park area in light blue
(I think the relative scale on the inset is still a little big!) |
The park property is to the south of Hillcrest, across the street from one of the Fairview projects, and downhill from existing development and along the creek that parallels Reed Road.
Reed Road here is signed for 45mph, and Battle Creek is also very zoomy.
The corner of Reed Road and Battle Creek lacks crosswalks and
sidewalks. While sidewalks on Reed Road have generally been part of
conditions for development and will be constructed by developers
(eventually), I'm not sure that crosswalks have ever been included, and the City will need to plan for these - as well as for lower speeds, hopefully. The streets are "minor arterials," but they will be increasingly residential.