A couple days ago the City proclaimed "West Salem’s 2nd Street NW Improvements Complete Ahead of Schedule."
Sharrow on westbound Second Street (early July) |
They bragged it included "bike and pedestrian street improvements" and fostered "a more pedestrian and bike-friendly environment."
There are a few sharrows. That's it.
Better than nothing? Maybe! They could be a minor incremental improvement. But more like the minimum incremental improvement rather than something more substantial.
The crucial decision over a decade ago on Second Street was to accommodate better curbside parking, and then to fit biking into the left-over space. Bike travel was always secondary.
In addition to the City's own decision for parking, sharrows generally are falling out of favor.
- As Strong Towns HQ, "What are sharrows worth?" They say, "Let's not waste paint on harmful sharrows."
- And at People for Bikes, "We Were Wrong About Sharrows." They say, "Sharrows do, however, accomplish something pernicious which I did not anticipate. They allow officials to take credit for doing something for bicycle safety without impacting car traffic, even though that something is next to nothing. It’s just pretending...."
Sharrows here are an inferior solution, used because the City wanted to prioritize cars, not because the City was making some great bikeway. (The recent vandalism of the intersection painting on Second Street is evidence that more traffic calming is likely necessary.)
Above all, the gap from Second Street to the Union Street Bridge path remains. ODOT's involved since Wallace Road is also a highway, OR-221, and they've been very balky and difficult, unwilling to help the City. There was a temporary crossing in 2022, which was very popular, but it led to nothing. (And we are apparently not going to talk about its success ever again.)