In the next few months, we hope the city will share with us what its plans are for improvement!
LAB Bicycle Friendly Community Feedback 2008
Publish at Scribd or explore others:
the Salem River Crossing project Build alternatives are designed to improve single occupant vehicle travel time…There is no serious attempt to improve the movement of people and goods across the river in a way that is efficient, cost-effective, and anticipates both climate change and peak oil. The project is wholly business-as-usual.
For modeling purposes, parking fees in downtown Salem were used as a one possible example of user fees that could be adjusted to influence travel demand. (2)Even if we suppose that the model is perfect, the analysis didn’t try tolling or congestion pricing. It adjusted parking pricing only, and limited that adjustment to the downtown area only, penalizing those who wished to patronize downtown merchants, whose patrons currently enjoy free parking, and didn’t impose any additional costs on those who might be shopping on Lancaster or taking trips elsewhere in the city. Although the modelers don’t discuss this explicitly in the memo, it’s likely that the parking fees didn’t reduce trip demand so much as shift discretionary trips from downtown to elsewhere. The minimal reduction is probably also an admission that many of the trips don't end or begin in downtown.
The results show that increasing the area where parking charges are applied in the downtown area and tripling the average amount charged could reduce auto trips by 10% (from 86.6% of trips to 76.2% of trips). (3)Now let’s look at transit. Here the assumptions are even more narrow.
The transit element consists of the operation of two new routes, one on Highway 22 and one on Wallace Road, each serving downtown (and possibly other employment destinations in the city)…. Stops were also minimized or limited to the park and ride lots provided. (4)The model added only two new stops, at the park and ride lots! The model did not add a robust level of enhanced transit service with a network of stops near the front doors of residents. The transit service is minimal and inconvenient, and makes people get in their cars – why would they get out of their cars to stop at a park and ride lot for a short trip into downtown? This is a fatal simplification.
The level of new transit service assumed in the model is a high level of service for the routes and geographies served. However, as shown above, this level of service does not produce a significant shift in total trips across the bridge. The bridge users in the peak hour have trip origins and destinations that extend well beyond the area served by the two new transit lines. (6)Note that they understand the problem of transfers, and yet insist on ignoring it.
This level of additional transit service would result in only very small daily changes in transit ridership compared to increasing the parking charges....the model shows that adding the increased transit service does not result in additional reductions in vehicle trips across the existing bridges.(5-6)In order to knock down the extent to which virtually any TSM/TDM option, like congestion pricing, tolling, or transit might relieve congestion in a no-build or low-build option, analysts used two poor straw men, that of parking pricing and inconvenient transit, to argue that the whole suite of TSM/TDM strategies cannot succeed.
Analysis to date has shown that providing transit system and operations improvements in the absence of user fees (tolls or parking charges) to discourage auto trips results in small reductions in demand. (1-2)and
As was demonstrated in the study of a stand-alone TSM/TDM alternative (see “TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept – Analysis and Results” memo, dated 8/15/07), improvements to the transit system such as more buses and improved headways still leave the transit system at a significant disadvantage compared to single occupant vehicles with respect to trip time across the river and individuals’ understood time value of money. Consequently, such improvements to the transit system will have relatively little effect on peak hour demand on the existing bridges until or unless there is a significant increase in travel time (e.g., significant congestion for single occupant vehicles but not for transit) or the cost of driving (e.g., tolls, congestion pricing, parking pricing, fuel prices) for single occupant vehicles. Because the Salem River Crossing project Build alternatives are designed to improve single occupant vehicle travel time over the future No Build condition and do not propose differential user fees (e.g., congestion pricing), a significant time vs. money disadvantage for transit trips would be maintained, even with significantly improved bus headways. (2-3)Unfortunately, it appears the analysis was not designed really to challenge or even seriously to investigate the assumption that TSM/TDM options are powerless to reduce congestion and improve the movement of people, goods, and services across the river. It was inadequate and served only to confirm the prevailing assumptions about the values of single-occupant vehicles and their easy movement.
Participate in legislative discussions regarding transportation priorities and funding, and advocate that health issues including bike and pedestrian facilities be considered.Looking towards the 2011 Legislature, the report urges that governmental partners,
Establish health as a priority in land-use planning and transportation decisions and possible legislation in 2011, including but not limited to, policies and funding for bike/pedestrian facilities on all appropriate streets statewide, adding health as a consideration in land-use planning policies and decisions; andTogether, these point to bicycling as an integral part of a healthy lifestyle, for individuals and for communities, not merely for recreation or for commuting, but as a key part of the way we think of community creation, community maintenance, and mobility.
Introduce a “Healthy Schools Act” in 2011, including but not limited to, requiring that school siting decisions facilitate biking and walking, allowing inclusion of school costs in system development charges paid by developers, banning advertising, offering physical education, and conducting health screenings.
We're organizing a bike rally together with Willamette students on Saturday, November 8th, at 2pm.
We will meet outside of the student dorm Terra, just off 12th St. in the student parking area (in between State St and Mission St), to depart on a bike ride through Salem downtown and pose for a photo in front of the capitol building. You don’t have to have a bike to participate, we will have other activities going on too and you can still pose for the photo.
The purpose is to send a message to our new Congress representative [Kurt Schrader] that we are fully expecting him to be a leader in the fight against global warming. Hope you can come!
The site of the former Battlecreek Golf Course in southeast Salem will host a cyclocross event Saturday.
There will be seven races, beginning at 10 a.m. Registration opens at 8 a.m. and runs until 15 minutes before each race. There is no pre-registration. Race costs vary from $5 for juniors to $20 for all other events and $10 for a second event.
The event is sanctioned by the Oregon Bicycle Racing Association and an OBRA license is required. A one-day license costs $5. An annual license is $10. Helmets are required.
For information, call Jeff McNamee at (503) 857-5733.
[Karl] Rohde says the BTA will seek to pass a resolution that recognizes funding for non-motorized projects as an essential part of a complete transportation system. According to Rohde, he wants bikes and peds to be thought of as “non-motorized transportation” and bike and ped facilities not be considered “trails” (a common wording that makes them seem like a frivolous expenditure in hard times) but rather as “non-motorized transportation corridors”.
Rohde says the idea is not to simply have lawmakers use different language, but to drive home the idea that, when drafting any transportation funding, lawmakers look for ways to fund bike and ped projects “every step of the way”.
South Salem Cycleworks had 5 Employees, 5 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 202.7 Miles for a rate of 94.6 Percent
Scotts Cycling 2008 had 7 Employees, 0 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 0 Miles for a rate of 0 Percent
Santiam Bicycle, Inc. had 15 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 136 Miles for a rate of 5.6 Percent
Northwest Rehabilitation Associates had 7 Employees, 2 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 126.6 Miles for a rate of 8.4 Percent
Oak Street Surgical Associates had 9 Employees, 4 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 299 Miles for a rate of 15.1 Percent
Marion-Polk Legal Aid Service had 11 Employees, 2 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 66 Miles for a rate of 6.1 Percent
Salem Happy Riders had 20 Employees, 3 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 268 Miles for a rate of 12.7 Percent
Western Mennonite School had 56 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 346.5 Miles for a rate of 0.9 Percent
Salem Pediatric Clinic had 60 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 150 Miles for a rate of 1.5 Percent
Lifesource Natural Foods had 66 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 295 Miles for a rate of 1.4 Percent
Greenpeace had 150 Employees, 3 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 449.2 Miles for a rate of 1.3 Percent
Salem Classical Fencing had 160 Employees, 4 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 110.4 Miles for a rate of 1.4 Percent
SWM had 200 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 135 Miles for a rate of 0.3 Percent
Garmin AT had 223 Employees, 15 Particpants, 7 New Riders, and commuted 2435.95 Miles for a rate of 4.2 Percent
salem clinic had 250 Employees, 3 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 287 Miles for a rate of 0.6 Percent
Statesman Journal had 300 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 64 Miles for a rate of 0.1 Percent
Willamette University had 450 Employees, 50 Particpants, 14 New Riders, and commuted 3402 Miles for a rate of 8.3 Percent
Salem Hospital had 3000 Employees, 3 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 253.5 Miles for a rate of 0 Percent
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife had 1 Employees, 1 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 120.4 Miles for a rate of 29.2 Percent
white rabbit mental health,pc had 2 Employees, 2 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 196 Miles for a rate of 43.8 Percent
USDA Natural Resouce Conservation Services had 7 Employees, 1 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 300 Miles for a rate of 10.7 Percent
Community Housing and Employment Support had 10 Employees, 1 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 1 Miles for a rate of 0.5 Percent
Oregon Commission on Children & Families had 30 Employees, 2 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 283 Miles for a rate of 5.9 Percent
Budget and Management Division, DAS had 40 Employees, 8 Particpants, 5 New Riders, and commuted 787.4 Miles for a rate of 12 Percent
Oregon State Library had 44 Employees, 1 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 112 Miles for a rate of 2 Percent
Chemawa Indian Health Center had 45 Employees, 1 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 114 Miles for a rate of 2 Percent
Salem Heights Elementary had 45 Employees, 0 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 0 Miles for a rate of 0 Percent
Richmond Roadrunners had 49 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 42.9 Miles for a rate of 1 Percent
BCD-Building Codes had 60 Employees, 0 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 0 Miles for a rate of 0 Percent
Or Dept of Land Conservation & Development had 60 Employees, 12 Particpants, 6 New Riders, and commuted 653.4 Miles for a rate of 12.8 Percent
Oregon Legislature had 70 Employees, 13 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 1032.5 Miles for a rate of 15.1 Percent
Oregon Office of the State Treasurer had 72 Employees, 3 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 731.8 Miles for a rate of 2.1 Percent
AASF #1, Oregon Army National Guard had 75 Employees, 3 Particpants, 3 New Riders, and commuted 137 Miles for a rate of 0.8 Percent
Parrish Middle School had 75 Employees, 2 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 141.5 Miles for a rate of 1.3 Percent
Oregon Department of Veterans' Affairs had 80 Employees, 2 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 212 Miles for a rate of 1.9 Percent
South Salem High School had 80 Employees, 8 Particpants, 4 New Riders, and commuted 821.2 Miles for a rate of 6.5 Percent
Oregon Dept of Energy had 94 Employees, 9 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 460.5 Miles for a rate of 5.3 Percent
Sprague High School had 120 Employees, 8 Particpants, 5 New Riders, and commuted 915.4 Miles for a rate of 3.5 Percent
OYA Central Office had 125 Employees, 1 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 56 Miles for a rate of 0.5 Percent
Oregon Water Resources Dept. had 142 Employees, 19 Particpants, 5 New Riders, and commuted 1254.4 Miles for a rate of 8.2 Percent
Oregon Parks and Recreation had 147 Employees, 7 Particpants, 3 New Riders, and commuted 588 Miles for a rate of 3 Percent
Salem main post office had 150 Employees, 3 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 420.1 Miles for a rate of 1.9 Percent
McNary High School had 160 Employees, 1 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 50 Miles for a rate of 0.6 Percent
Salem-Keizer Transit had 200 Employees, 3 Particpants, 1 New Riders, and commuted 227 Miles for a rate of 0.7 Percent
Oregon Department of Agriculture had 325 Employees, 9 Particpants, 3 New Riders, and commuted 624.8 Miles for a rate of 1.8 Percent
Oregon Department of Education had 500 Employees, 5 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 492 Miles for a rate of 0.7 Percent
ODOT Salem Area had 501 Employees, 52 Particpants, 6 New Riders, and commuted 5221.3 Miles for a rate of 7.2 Percent
Consumer and Business Services had 950 Employees, 11 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 1383.6 Miles for a rate of 0.8 Percent
Oregon Department of Revenue had 980 Employees, 2 Particpants, 0 New Riders, and commuted 341 Miles for a rate of 0.2 Percent
Oregon Department of Human Services HSB had 1000 Employees, 5 Particpants, 2 New Riders, and commuted 1485.8 Miles for a rate of 0.3 Percent
Oregon State Hospital had 1200 Employees, 14 Particpants, 15 New Riders, and commuted 844.82 Miles for a rate of 0.5 Percent
Marion County had 1251 Employees, 15 Particpants, 3 New Riders, and commuted 1767.6 Miles for a rate of 0.7 Percent
Oregon Department of Justice had 1400 Employees, 32 Particpants, 9 New Riders, and commuted 3125.47 Miles for a rate of 1.3 Percent
City of Salem had 1542 Employees, 24 Particpants, 7 New Riders, and commuted 2231.8 Miles for a rate of 1 Percent
Department of Human Service Summer St. had 3000 Employees, 4 Particpants, 3 New Riders, and commuted 472 Miles for a rate of 0.1 Percent
Well, we did it again. Fall Bike Safety Eduction classes were a great success. As you know, we taught at both JGEMS (Jane Goodall Environmental Magnet School) and Pratum School. Just one class at each school: 30 6th. graders at JGEMS, and a combined 3rd, 4th, 5th grades class at Pratum.
At Waldo we had 2 kids that could not ride at the beginning of the week. And thanks to the mom who came up to me and made me aware of the situation about her daughter. We went right outside, got her a bike, and she was riding it in less than one minute. no exaggeration, I mean one time down the slight grassy slope coasting, and the next time she was pedaling away. Come to find out, she has had experience in swimming, ballet, soccer, and other physical activity. Great balance and excellent motor skills. I worked with her two more days after school and she did great on the community ride. Another non-riding student could not stay after school but one day, but after about one hour, I finally had him riding! He was not ready to go on the community ride, but I am hoping he can continue to practice at home in the future.
Highlights included the kid who just could not get the hang of "emergency stopping." He flipped over his handlebars all 4 times he attempted emergency stopping. Nothing injured but his pride, and the class was quite entertained! The "hot rod" kids who is riding "no hands" and singing while others are white-knuckling the grips while they wobble down the track - some kids are very frightened of being on the road and are so stiff and tense they can barely ride. Others are so oblivious to the cars they just cruise along, not a care in the world. I guess that is what being a kid is all about.
Pratum is a great little school. It was a little different teaching 3rd and 4th graders, I had not done that before. I know some of the traffic concepts and intersection practice was over their heads, but the hands-on stuff they could certainly handle.
One little 3rd grader was just leaning how to ride, with very limited skills when we started the Bike program. One of the dedicated teachers really took the time to work with her after we got her fitted with helmet and bike. She rode as best she could as the class progressed through the drills and exercises. She crashed, skinned her knee, cried, got up and did it again. She really persevered, and by Friday, she rode the whole community ride! You could just see her self-confidence swelling - she even asked to lead the group on the ride when it was not her turn - by the time we got back from riding on the busy street and down a long dirt road next to the railroad tracks, she had named her bike "Speedy" and could not keep the smile off her face - her mom brought her personal bike to school for me to fix. I removed the training wheels and pumped up the tires on her pink "Barbie" bike. It is way too small for her, but she rode it at school during recess for two days. Teachers and other students were quite impressed with her ability to ride a bike. I know it's something she will never forget.
Thanks to all the volunteers, and thanks for your expert help. Be safe over the winter and I'll be in touch for the big spring season.
Robert
Yesterday our Metropolitan Planning Organization announced the release of the draft Metropolitan Transportation Safety Action Plan . On Mond...