Last Monday the bill for the Columbia River Crossing, Portland's $4 Billion Bridge and Highway proposal, moved out of Committee and will have a vote on the House floor tomorrow, on Monday the 25th.
 |
Standard Oil Monopoly, 1904. Detail: Library of Congress
This really is going to be the theme image for the session |
 |
| Clouds and Shadow |
There's nothing new to say other than, "wow." Pick your metaphor and image: tentatacular, steamrollery, blitzkriegy...Whether it looks like
cthulhu or
nike, it's the goddess of greenhouse gas, corporate victory and pave, pave, pave.
Here are some links. (So many of the arguments map directly to our third bridge mess.) BikePortland on
the committee vote and on
Monday's floor vote - below check out the awesome animated gif of the bridge from the post!
Willamette Week on
the fictions behind the financing "plan." A separate post has
a long quote from Senate President Courtney in it. Former BTA-Director Evan Manvel has
a piece on the flip-flops of politicians, including Governor Kitzhaber who once said "It's time we challenged the idea that says we can build our way out of congestion by adding more freeway lanes
." And economist Joe Cortright offers
an analysis of the funding plan in HB 2800.
More interesting perhaps, at least because it is different, is the
Portland BTA update on its legislative agenda. As for the CRC, they say, "The BTA does not support HB 2800 and we are not working on the bill." They
posted their position paper on it, and while it says
We cannot support a project that will lock up state, federal, and other transportation money
for the next two decades, increase congestion, and increase global warming pollution from
cars and trucks.
They also don't say they oppose HB 2800. I don't see how they can remain on the sidelines for this.
As for their priorities, they cite SB 247 and HB 2310, and also two bills that don't have a number yet. The deadline for bills - something of a soft deadline, it's true, since a very small number of "priority" bills can still be introduced - was on Thursday, and it is concerning that they weren't able to line up details to get the bills introduced earlier. Maybe they'll be able to pull out a rabbit with a gut-and-stuff, but overall it looks like a legislative agenda of diminished expectations and nibbling around the edges. Not very inspiring.
Two of the bike-relevant bills have Salem-area origins. As the BTA has cut loose advocates downstate, and retrenched for the Portland area alone, they may have hampered their
ability to forge a broader statewide consensus on multi-modal
transportation issues. Portland-area legislators by themselves may not be able
to carry out the BTA agenda, even as modest as it is. A Salem-area legislator,
Representative Kevin Cameron, has introduced a bill that would toll people who bike on the bridge. (BikePortland reaction
here and more on co-sponsor and person who bikes Rep. Tobias Read
here.)
Senator Winters' bill for a task force on bicycle safety could frame the debate in negative terms. The BTA's decision to go at things alone with a Portland-centric focus has possibly made it more likely that unexpected and potentially unhelpful developments will arise from legislators and attract significant support outside the Portland area.
The
Active Transportation Summit agenda has finally been released, and it will be interesting to see how the lobby day goes in late April at the legislature. It's looking like the important action will all be wrapped up by then.
In
committee meetings and hearings, the House Committee on Transportation and Economic Development will hold a hearing on HB 2453, which will move road funding towards a mileage tax rather than gas tax. Details and agenda below.
Other bills remain in committee. More detailed updates - and the gif! - after the jump.