Last week the City released
a final draft of the Winter-Maple Bikeway Plan. Overall, it points to ways our current formal planning paradigm is sometimes too focused on technical solutions and fails to give sufficient attention to the politics of actually realizing a plan with funding and construction.
Back in May
when we all got our first look at the draft concepts, you might remember a set of key challenges:
- Parking reduction (and potential loss of meter revenue) from angle
to parallel. Will the City and State and other neighbors embrace this?
- How will the two businesses on Norway at Fairgrounds receive the
idea of closing that small section of Norway to cars? Are they on board
yet?
- And difficulty with the railroad in securing permission for the reconfigured crossings on Maple.
Most of the other details seemed like details too small to fuss over. The incremental difference between an 80% solution and a 90% solution is rarely all that important, and just doing something is almost always better than the
status quo. In any case, there is not much change from the May draft concepts to these December final concepts.
So how the final recommendations managed these three moments will be central to an opinion of the overall plan.
Implementation does not seem very Urgent
But first, there is one overwhelming impression from the final published study.
It's not clear how serious we are. Towards the end of the plan, there is a table with a staging plan. A lot of the pieces are envisioned as "long-term" for completion five or more years out.