The project team hasn't published any new materials, so there's not much to say yet - other than to continue to push the City for changes to carspace. Until we grapple with the disproportion and zoominess of carspace downtown, our fiddling with the sidewalks will be cosmetic, principally rearranging the deck chairs. This may yield incremental improvement, but it will not yield the enduring, structural change we need.
(See previous notes on the first Open House here and here.)
The Open House will be in the Senator Hearing Room/Courthouse Square, 555 Court St. NE from 5:30pm to 7pm.
Cherriots Service Expansion
At the same time, in a nice bit of concurrent scheduling, Cherriots has scheduled their first Open House for what they are calling "A Better Cherriots." They'll be next door at the Downtown Transit Center in the Customer Service area from 6pm to 8pm on Tuesday the 13th. That's just around the corner at 220 High Street NE. It makes great sense to double-up and hit both of them. (Facebook event here.)
They've got a series of other Open Houses and less formal tabling scheduled all around the city through the rest of the month in into March. You can see the full list here.
(See previous notes on the Needs Analysis here.)
Systems Development Charges
|Urban Growth Management (UGM) Plan - Background|
City of Salem memo, 1990
The land that developers select is not always the most cost effective for a community to serve.It is interesting that we used to charge something closer to the real costs to service new development. But only water and sewer is called out here, however, and transportation SDCs may be new since then.
The City Council, in 1979, was faced with these same pressures of new development. In an effort to balance public spending programs for infrastructure to serve new development and at the same time satisfy current ratepayers' and taxpayers' needs for maintaining the present city water, sewer and street systems, the Council adopted the UGM plan.
New development, outside the Current Developed Area (the area of contiguous development) was to pay its own way. The City would do some new water and sewer line extensions to serve new growth by relying on a proposed 1% Real Estate Transfer Tax. The money collected from the tax was to be used solely to help serve new growth. By itself it would not be enough, but with the UGM plna, it was felt it would help a lot. The tax was presented to the public for a vote in 1980 and was defeated soundly....
To again attempt to speak to the funding problem of serving new growth, the Council, in May of 1982, approved a construction tax/development fee (CDF) to be levied on new development. The collected funds would then be used to provide infrastructure extensions to serve new growth....
The development community, led by the Salem Homebuilders, objected to the continued collection of the CDF on the grounds that it was too much and the money didn't get spent where they thought it should have been. In July 1988 the Council terminated the CDF and replaced it with a small systems development charge (SDC) for water and sewer of $600.00 per new home. The new SDC will raise substantially less money for new growth line extensions than did the old CDF or the hoped-for real estate transfer tax.
So, here we are 10 years later; the pace of new development quickens again and we hold only a small sack of coins (the SDC) to speak to major water and sewer line extensions needed to serve new growth.
|Land on the edges is expensive to serve with new infrastructure|
and imposes a transportation burden on people:
It's car-dependent, and Cherriots can't service it
(City of Salem)