Crosswalk and bus stop at Royvonne and Commercial (late August) |
The piece focuses on a mother's advocacy, but it also dwells on the roadblocks she found.
One of them is the way we subordinate people on foot to businesses and car traffic:
Salem traffic engineer Kevin Hottmann suggested [Elizabeth] Pruden visit a number of local businesses near the intersection and ask them to write letters urging the city to establish a crosswalk.Like the death and circumstances aren't enough? Even if the businesses fought it - and they will in other places - we should insist on better safety for people who aren't traveling by car. We should not be so solicitous about getting "permission" from nearby businesses for safety improvements! This is a politics of safety we need to get past.
The piece also notes that Shatamera, who apparently lived east of Commercial Street, "mostly met up with friends at nearby Woodmansee Park."
Past event, via Facebook |
A safety demonstration will follow the dedication. Elizabeth Pruden is
inviting attendees to bring signs to display at the intersection with catchy phrases like, “I like drivers that take it slow” and “Ignore your phone so we can all make it home.”But we also need to consider not just individual choices about compliance and care, but also system changes.
With the flashers installed and shrouded, not quite open; but still signed for 40mph, July 29th |
via Placemakers |
The crosswalk here will be helpful, but it is layered on top of a stroad that is still structured for autoist priority, and there is more to do.
(See previous notes on the intersection and crash here, here, and here.)
Addendum, Sunday the 6th
Here's a clip from "Field Guide for Selecting Countermeasures at Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Locations" (2018, USDOT):
Consistent with what GreenDrake says in the comments, a this kind of flashing beacon does not seem to be recommended for crossings with a 40mph posted speed. It recommends instead a form of beacon that has overhead lights and stop bars painted in the street. I'm not sure it's clear cut to say the installation here is straight-up wrong, but it may very well be underpowered by current design standards (which are themselves conservative and autoist). Our installation then may be stretching a use in the same way the City stretched the use of sharrows to paint them on Commercial Street downtown.
4 comments:
The SJ article does not seem to be online yet, and the City's website and FB don't seem to have any news on the crosswalk dedication, either. So for an event involving the Mayor, there's an odd lack of notification circulating around it. If things are posted/published later in the day, this post may be updated.
Most of the USDOT guidelines for use of RRFBs seem to indicate they are for use where speed limits are below 40 MPH so I am a bit puzzled about why the limit hasn't been reduced in this section of Commercial.
Not to be too much of a stickler for terminology -- this is not a new crosswalk. There are crosswalks at every intersection, regardless of whether they are marked or not and motorists are obligated to yield to pedestrians who are in those crosswalks. Certainly, the marking of this crosswalks and the enhanced safety measures are commendable. It is very unfortunate that somebody has to die in order for ODOT and the city to take these kinds of actions.
Added clip to flesh out GreenDrake's point. I did not know this about the guidelines for this kind of beacon, and this is good to know.
Post a Comment