Both the Riverfront Park and Downtown Streetscape planning processes have released new concepts and new surveys this past week.
In one key way, they are exactly backwards!
The Riverfront Park concepts show enhanced crosswalk treatments, while the Streetscape plans are essentially silent on downtown crosswalks.
In central ways, the Riverfront Park project team appears to understand that external connections, principally connections across streets or across units of analysis, are as important an internal connections, the sidewalks and paths within the block or unit of analysis.
This seems backwards because, you know, the park plan's about a park, and the streetscape plan is about streets.
So we're back to one of the primary criticisms of the Streetscape Plan: By omitting analysis of the streets themselves, it's hamstrung and hobbled from the start.
Conversely, the Riverfront Park Plan appears to get that both structural and decorative elements are important.
Silence on Downtown Crosswalks
You might think a slide titled "Knit Downtown Together" would have more on the knots and loops and ligaments between blocks and other connections. Like crosswalks!
But it does not.
Instead if focuses on trees, clear zones for walking, and consistent styling with street furniture or other decorative elements.
 |
| Missing an important element of "knitting" |
On wayfinding and art, there are a couple of crosswalks (they appear to be the north part of the crosswalk on Front at Court), but the focus is on a horizontal view and what a person sees above the ground, at eye-level, and not so much on the ground.