Thursday night the 21st, the Historic Landmarks Commission will
hear about new street standards proposed by the City.
Staff say the presentation will include a discussion of "Sidewalk width
& scoring patterns; Pedestrian bulb outs at corners;
Tree wells & grates; and lighting both pedestrian level and
street
level." Another set of details will be discussed in one or more
subsequent presentations.
In the context of the HLC, modern standards must stress compatibility
rather than authenticity in historic districts, so it's of limited
usefulness to see "what used to be" as if that might guide us on
appropriate development and standards. The move from mud to pavement, and from
boardwalk to concrete sidewalk, is progress obviously, and we'd almost never want historical accuracy on these.
In fact, "mud" was often code for a rank
slurry of poop and sticky rain-moistened dirt! When the
State Highway Commission's motto was "
Get Oregon out of the Mud," read accordingly - and savor the progress. (I think we have too much pavement, of course, but I do not mind at all that modern pavement is a standard road surface!)
In other areas things are less clear. Preservationists go to great lengths to check the scourge of vinyl and aluminum windows, and yet have much less to say about car traffic and parking management. For both 19th century and even streetcar-era development, cars are the intrusion and disruption! Go figure.
 |
Same location today! It's built up a little for parking,
but the alley still dips into a bowl - and see the steeple in back.
I'm glad for concrete and asphalt over mud and boards,
but this is still pretty drab. |
Anyway, here's a couple of sidewalk scenes, then and now.
In the first pair, most things have changed and the only thing really visible in both pictures is the steeple. I love that there was covered bike parking, however.