|Entry to Minto closed for high water in Spring, 2012|
|Paths were closed again in December, 2012|
Minto Brown and Wallace Marine Parks to Close - 02/14/14Clearly flooding and high water will affect the Minto Bridge, and we've never really had a good answer about this. The City purports to answer it in the Minto bridge FAQ (July 9, 2013):
The City of Salem has closed two Salem Parks due to Willamette River levels.
The Willamette River in Salem is projected to rise above 24 feet Friday evening and continue rising through Wednesday, February 19, 2014. Access and parking at both locations are impacted when the river reaches 24 feet.
It is currently projected to crest at 27 feet, one foot below flood stage, on Thursday, February 20, 2014.
Both parks will remain closed until the Willamette River returns to normal levels.
I am concerned about flooding of the Bridge and Trail. How is this being addressed in the design?However! As we can see, the park is often closed well below the 100-year flood elevation! It is not very meaningful - or is perversely meaningful - to suggest that "alternate routes" are available when the whole park is closed.
Bridge - The tied arch bridge concept assumes constructing a bridge one foot above the 100-year flood elevation, so flooding is not expected except in significant storm events exceeding the 100-year event. The Bridge and Bridge landings are being designed to guard against damage from erosion during flood events. Increasing the height of the Bridge increases the length of the Bridge and cost of construction, without an identified benefit. Managing the costs to maximize value is a key objective in the delivery of the project.
Trail – The Trail will be located on the top of an existing berm on Minto Island. The edges of the paved Trail surface will be thickened, reducing the likelihood that flood flows will damage the Trail. The area of the planned Trail remained above high water in the January, 2012 flood event. Connecting trails in Minto Brown Island Park do flood, but alternate routes located above the 100-year flood elevation are available.
An equally relevant question may be, not just what is the risk of the bridge or path system being wiped out or damaged, but how often will we be unable to use the bridge and path system?
|In December 2012, closures came at about 17 feet|
|In February 2014, closures came at about 20 feet|
In the City's press release this time, they reference car driving and car parking begin impacted at 24 feet, and it wouldn't be surprising that walking or biking are impacted at lower water levels, like 19 feet. It probably depends on how saturated and fast- or slow-draining are the soils: I bet the elevation at which there is impact is higher earlier in the season when the soils are less saturated and can drain faster or absorb more; since we've had an extraordinarily dry winter, Minto may be closing at higher levels than it did in the much wetter seasons at both ends of 2012.
At this point with funding all but sewn up, it's mostly moot when bridge will close. It doesn't really matter that we might be able to use the path and bridge only 10 or 11 months out of the year. The only way in which this really matters is the extent to which the City continues to position the Minto Bridge and path system as a key commuting corridor. In some funding applications they found a herd of unicorns: Up to 27,000 non-auto commuters who could use the route for commuting. (See, no matter what kind of bridge it is, you can be sure the City will have some kind of crazy traffic projections!) But of course it doesn't connect jobs, homes, and storefronts in any meaningful way. It's a park.
|Puffery with no relation to reality|
Again, at this point, it's not really that big a deal that the bridge won't be available for all 52 weeks each year, but it's not something the City has been good about acknowledging, and it would be nice for Citizens to have a realistic expectation for how often they won't be able to use it.
Update, March 16th
A visit to Minto Park this weekend turned up a surprising amount of trail closure!
|On March 15th, paths are still flooded|
|A path going north - the C path - is closed|
|As the B path turns east, it is also closed|
But the route is also along an abandoned gravel road, and because of the new conservation easement, it is not clear that this route will be able to be paved one day. In fact, the official park map doesn't include it in the list of designated paths.
So it's a "preferred" route, not because of the quality of width of the path surface, but because it's least likely to be flooded!
|It's not clear that the gravel road of the "preferred" route can be paved|
since it may be inside or touching the conservation easement.
|The C and B paths were closed; the "preferred route" is not designated|
in brown and is also "closed to vehicle traffic."
|The "preferred route" traverses the "rise" indicated in yellow;|
other paths go through lower "swale" ground
adjacent to "slough" depressions.
These are zones flooded in winter.
Update, December 17th, 2015
After a summer of exceedingly low water, we are now getting a much wetter than usual December.
|Trails closed for sure at 18 feet or so - sign via Hinessight|