In all the talk about the Kitzhaber-Brown transition and mess, there's a remarkable anniversary that seems to have gone largely unnoticed in the press.
Women
gained the vote in 1912, and after winning election in 1914, the first female Representative and Senator served as lawmakers in the session of 1915.
In the run-up to the session, the
Capital Journal published a series of caricatures of all or most of the Legislators, and here are the pictures of Representative
Marian Towne and Senator
Kathryn Clark.
Especially as they are in a series with caricatures of all the men, it's not easy to filter out the general humor directed towards all and to discern anything meaningful specifically about gender and culture. Mostly I see equal opportunity jokes - but maybe you will spot something significant. It is interesting the two come from southern Oregon rather than from the more urban valley. Perhaps the penumbral influence of San Francisco is relevant.
Seemingly long ago already, Governor Brown signed
Senate Bill 324, which lifts the sunset on the low-carbon fuel standard first enacted under Governor Kulongowski.
|
A century ago it was the cowboy archtype;
Our modern "cowboy" as failed superhero |
It seems like the law is going to have some cascading unintended side effects, and is not in the end going to turn out to be a sustainable or wise way to tackle the constellation of fuel, transportation, and carbon emissions.
In a better summary than the overheated claims its proponents make, Representative Julie Parrish (R) writes
Fracking, pipelines
and coal
trains used in conventional fuel production
have tangible (and sometimes
negative) environmental impacts that
are visible and immediately present.
But “clean fuels” that rely on high intensity
farming can have equally
tangible (and negative) environmental
impacts. Since the impacts aren’t visible,
it’s easier to accept them. Further,
there are serious societal impacts associated
with biofuels.
The bill isn't so much pork as it is corn. Lots of corn, even GMO corn. It's a corny solution for greenwashing gas instead of just simply using less gas.
See also Rep. Parrish's
Oregonian piece a few days later. Her criticism is not merely partisan.
The more reflexively partisan Republicans will use its symbolism to opt out of more serious conversation about raising the gas tax and funding transportation maintenance and expanding multi-modal travel facilities.
If "transportation costs" were really an issue, there's a whole 'nother agenda the opponents of SB 324 might support, an agenda for lower cost household transportation and lower cost government transportation investment. The agenda could be about small-c conservative values for thrift, saving, local small business, and community.
But hey, why save a few thousand dollars a year by going low-car or even car-free when you can make car payments, spend aggravated hours isolated in a car, and spew carbon and other pollution in the air?
SB 324 may well be something of a pyrrhic victory.