I think they are too zoomed out to be really useful, but as a kind of snapshot, maybe they tell us some things.
|These neighborhood hubs sure cluster along our major arterials|
|Three of the stickers for the mapping charette. |
Is the bump from 200 to 330 homes actually enough for a hub?
At least as I read the "hub" concept, it is supposed to be more deeply embedded in residential areas, maybe on a cross street with a collector, or at a park, but more "corner-store" than "big box and parking lot."
So I read this pattern of pin placement as evidence of a disconnect.
Another potential disconnect is in the profligate way we throw around a desire for more open space and avoid more development. Did Salemites place a pin at every undeveloped lot in the city?
|Do we really need this much more open space?|
Glancing at the pin and sticker summaries, I see too much of mid-century autoism and see a lack of ingredients for something really interesting.
The City and consultant team will zoom in and sift the wheat from the chaff. What is popular is sometimes wrong or unusable, and the yield of genuinely useful ideas will be a smaller proportion of the total spitballing. It will be interesting to see how the team filters all this.
The City's also announced Open Houses for mid-March. There will be more to say as these approach and more concepts are published.