Saturday, December 10, 2022

Transformation of Shelton Creek to Shelton Ditch was Depression-era Project

What exactly happened in 1934 with Shelton Ditch is for another time, but it is interesting to note that work in the summer, fall, and winter of 1934 was part of the immediate predecessor to the New Deal, a program under the Federal Emergency Relief Administration flowing to the State Emergency Relief Administration. Broadly speaking, Shelton Ditch as we know it today is a Depression-era project. (See yesterday's post for extract from Wendy Kroger's History of Pringle Creek Watershed.)

The 1895 Sanborn map shows the major creeks running into downtown. There is the "stream of mystery," which we have nearly totally lost, but which in flood times has reminded us of its course, and the meandering Shelton Creek, along with a couple of lost branches.

1895 Sanborn shows Shelton Creek
and "stream of mystery"

The USGS maps of 1917 and 1925 show more detail on the braided, distributed network of seasonal creeks between what we now call Mill Creek and Pringle Creek.

1917 and 1925 USGS maps show
distributed system of seasonal streams

Ditching Shelton Creek was a flood control proposal.

September 1928

In 1934 that early Depression-era jobs program, the SERA, funded brush clearing, widening, and straightening of the creek as well as other waterways.

Friday, December 9, 2022

City Council, December 12th - Shelton Ditch

This is it, the last City Council meeting of the year. Council meets on Monday the 12th. There are several annual reviews on the agenda. Probably the one for Police is most important, but others will have more to say on that. Here are some incidental comments on the others.

Shelton Creek? Shelton Ditch? April 13th, 1937

There is a bank stabilization project for Shelton Ditch. Its origin has been a mystery. The first mention in the newspaper may be in 1930, and then in 1934 a canal, as part of a flood control project, was made to connect it with Mill Creek. Then through the rest of the 1930s it appears constantly in the news as a WPA-funded project, with each instance of flooding (as above), and as needing constant maintenance. Before 1934 it does not seem to be continuous. Maybe we'll be able to return to this some time. Wendy Kroger's History of Pringle Creek Watershed summarized many leads, but determined no settled narrative for its origin and development.

On the 1878 Illustrated Atlas Map, Pringle Creek is joined at Church Street by Shelton Ditch and a stream of mystery which split south from the Mill Race, beginning between 12th and 13th, Mill and Trade Streets, flowing north of and roughly parallel to Mill Street until it turned almost 90 degrees south along Church Street, crossing Bellevue. Two earlier writers note this stream. According to landscape architect Elizabeth Lord writing a description of Pringle Park, “...There was Pringle Creek meandering through Bush Pasture, the Shelton Ditch in natural state, very attractive trees on the bank and the third, Mill Creek, all three joining hands under the Church Street bridge...” (Lord 1983)....

Did Shelton Ditch begin as a 1930s Great Depression work project to tame Mill Creek flood waters? Maps show another Shelton Ditch (or Creek) in the mid-1800s coming off Mill Creek east of Airport Road, curving “in natural state, very attractive trees on the bank,” crossing a corner of the Post Office property on 25th, and traveling along Shelton and Mission Streets for several blocks (Chapman 1995). The Depot Addition Historic Landmark Nomination indicated that the ditch was built on an earlier alignment of Turner Road, which was abandoned in 1931.

According to a City of Salem Public Works memo regarding the Shelton Ditch/Winter Street Bridge Flood Mitigation Project, “Shelton Ditch was ‘constructed’ generally along the existing Shelton Creek alignment...” (Lambert 1998). Is South Mill Creek really Pringle Creek, or is it the old Shelton Ditch, or is it the old flume? To complicate matters further, Mill Creek overflows during flood conditions to both the East and Middle forks of Pringle Creek. [link added]

Maybe as part of the forthcoming "Goal 5" inventory, Shelton Ditch will get more attention and we will learn more about its origin and the human interventions that made its current form.

"Shelton street ditch?" Dec. 30th, 1928

The City has started its own "year in review." Later this month in the blog's year in review post, we'll engage that in more detail. The City's document is primarily an exercise in PR, and is rather uncritical.

It leads with street art and a new city flag. Which are neat and all, but are not the most substantive of accomplishments for the City.

Further in there is a slide on the Council subcommittee on the Climate Action Plan, but it focuses on proceduralism, the mere existence of the committee, and not any decisions they made or actual progress on reducing emissions.

Signalling only? Or action?

Though it's probably just an innocent mistake, on the very final slide Councilor Leung was omitted and her successor, who won't be sworn in until January, and had nothing to do with 2022 accomplishments on Council, included.

Councilor Leung is erased by accident

Together these suggest the document was not fully baked. The impulse to publish a review is a good one, but the document published here needed more thought, more editorial review, and more self-awareness about the weights of things and about actual accomplishments. It should be more self-critical, not just boosting.

Thursday, December 8, 2022

Astoria Burned Down in 1922

Exactly 100 years ago Astoria's downtown completely burned up. It dominated the afternoon paper here.

December 8th, 1922

At this time, in many ways Astoria could be considered the second city in Oregon. It had a higher average wage than Portland, and it had a larger business sector than Salem or Eugene.

Astoria bigger than Salem
December 24th, 1921

The morning paper's first report underlined relief efforts.

December 9th, 1922

The afternoon headline the next day focused on speculation over cause.

Tuesday, December 6, 2022

An Unbalanced Bookshelf: Charles H. Carey's History of Oregon in Proposed Mural

The proposed critter and bookshelf mural for The Rivers on Court and Front Streets downtown has occasioned a good bit of comment, mostly positive, some of it as a useful newspeg for criticism about the Library's weeding policy and the questions about the current status of the Hugh Morrow Collection.

As it turns out, one of the books seemingly represented in it came out exactly 100 years ago.

History of Oregon by Charles Henry Carey at No. 1

I am pretty sure the three volume set indicated at No. 1 is the History of Oregon by Charles Henry Carey. The Salem Library appears to have one set, in the catalogue anyway, if perhaps not on the shelves. (Published in 1922, it is out of copyright and also is digitized here: Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3.) 

It was a notable work a century ago!

Oregonian, October 1st, 1922

But while it is still useful today for some purposes, especially as it contains capsule biographies helpful with caution in genealogical research, it is not one we would generally regard as authoritative today. Notice in the Oregonian words like "romance" and "lore." To say "lore of state exalted" is to say there is an ideological aim, even propaganda aim, for the work. 

The process of "quieting the Indian title to the soil" is discussed with fairness to both sides.

Yet "quieting the Indian title" already shows where the balance of power is, and on whose side "fairness" is supposed to reside.

Its main use today might be as an historical document of settler colonialist historiography, rather than as a standard source for a contemporary narrative of history. Still, in both direct and indirect ways it is an important text for understanding local history.

Monday, December 5, 2022

Center St Bridge Seismic Pushed out to 2027

You may recall that the October MWACT agenda listed a check-in on the Center Street Bridge seismic project.

Project sheet from 2019

The agenda item had said the "Construction year is estimated to be in 2025."

Oct. 2022: "Construction year...in 2025"

The presentation disclosed the project has been pushed out two years now to 2027, and as I read it the tone of the update suggests more delay is possible. It doesn't read as expressing firmness or urgency.

Saturday, December 3, 2022

Mayor Hoy Signals Interests when Meeting Mayor Wu of Boston

Late this week the City blurbed Mayor Hoy's participation in a "Harvard program for new Mayors."

It's not the first time a Mayor has gone to some kind of conference or gathering that might be described as professional development or continuing education. So it wasn't necessarily remarkable in that way, but perhaps its location right at the beginning of a tenure was a little remarkable.

You may recall Mayor Bennett going to Boise to "to review its downtown layout and revitalization efforts" in 2016. We never heard a peep in public about what he might have learned. In 2013 Mayor Peterson attended an Institute on City Design. That didn't seem to bear much fruit either. These trips and conferences don't ever seem to have ripples, at least ones visible publicly.

By contrast, Mayor Hoy immediately pointed to a reformer and to a world outside of Salem and outside of himself. He seems to relish the learning and show openness to new things.

via Twitter

Mayor Wu of Boston is an interesting figure in transportation reform. I have not paid close attention to her, but maybe more will be warranted.

via Twitter

In a Q & A published on Boston.com she said:

I don’t see cars as the enemy. I see traffic and wasted time as the enemy. Pollution is the enemy.

Look, I’m in a multigenerational household. I have two young kids. I know the way that our streets are currently designed. We get in the car to go places as well. And so, it’s not an all or nothing proposition to say we need to make changes so that our whole system and the many ways that people get around all fit together.

Getting rid of traffic is an urgent issue. It is choking the growth of our economy. It’s making our housing market more strained. It’s affecting so many aspects of people’s day-to-day lives. It’s miserable to be stuck in traffic to get to work, and that makes it harder for companies to locate here or for young people to connect with the internship opportunities and social activities and resources that we’re trying to create for everyone all across the city.

She's also got attention in large, mainstream and national publications, and underlined themes on transportation and change.

Friday, December 2, 2022

City Council, December 5th - Housing Crisis and Road Safety

With the holiday season, Council meetings come in a rush, one-two-three in consecutive weeks. They meet again on Monday.

A couple of items on our housing crisis lead the way.

They will extend "Emergency Declaration related to unsheltered residents through December 31, 2023." This will help get the microshelter villages and safepark site up and going.

Perhaps emboldened by recent action in Portland and Bend, they will also start a "policy review" on "unsheltered homeless." On the surface this looks like it will include the search for ways to criminalize people camping. Others will have better things to say on many of the details. I want to focus on one element:

What reasonable options exist to the City to protect human life by restricting outdoor sheltering near busy or high speed roadways?

We should remember that being sheltered in a single-detached house with a mortgage is no guarantee of safety.

The house was no protection, in 2017 via Twitter

Speed is the problem. We should protect human life by curbing car abuse and jaydriving.

Front page this week

Here's a larger list of deaths during the phase that prompted the declaration of emergency.

Killed in 2022

Killed in 2021

Killed in 2020

Some of these, particularly those not named, were likely camping, and are people envisioned as subject to the "policy review."

But our problem with death in or near the roadway is fundamentally a driving problem, not always, or even often, an "outdoor sheltering" problem. 

Both I-5 and railroads are access controlled, and those operating vehicles on them have long stopping distances. They do necessarily imply different standards than for urban streets. But a busy street like Lancaster Drive or Front Street is still an urban street, and we should not apply the same standards we would on I-5.

Hopefully Council and Staff will undertake this review with nuance, not victim-blaming, and properly center the fact we have a driving problem also.