On June 3rd, the AIA-Salem Chapter gathered for an awards dinner to celebrate local design as well as to announce and present design awards for 2014. The event was moderated by Award Committee Chairman Alan Costic, AIA and Jurist Bill Seider, FAIA was on hand to present Awards as well as to provide jury comments and insight into their selection process.The last round of awards was in 2010, and with the Great Recession and all, there hasn't been very much new design and construction. So that should frame our expectations.
Five Salem firms submitted a total of 13 projects for consideration to a three person Jury consisting of Becca Cavell, FAIA, Portland, Bill Seider, FAIA, Eugene, and Jane Jarrett, Portland. Upon deliberation, the Jury awarded two Merit Awards and one Honor Award. In addition, a People’s Choice Award was voted on by the public at large.
Two buildings in particular are interesting and, maybe, show how the way the buildings fit into the urban fabric may not adequately have been considered - that is, the building may have been considered more as absolute sculpture than as part of a city context.
- Careful attention to solar shading based on orientation
- Well organized plan
- Strong urban fabric building
Indeed, I think it mistakes style and massing for functional relationships. It is telling there are no people in this image. And the first floor windows on the corner are for a classroom rather than for a restaurant or something with an active relationship to foot-traffic and sidewalk life. It doesn't really greet the sidewalk. And we've talked about the bike parking, which isn't very good. It's also not sufficiently mixed-use to qualify as a "strong" urban building. In the off-hours, as in the photo, it's almost as desolate as the parking garage on the kitty-corner.
By contrast a building with some admittedly awkward style elements mops the floor for functional relationships, and it is not surprising there are meaningful numbers of people in the photo!
Community Development Block Grant Survey has Autoist Bias
The focus of the Community Development Block Grant and HOME funds isn't on transportation, so we shouldn't make too much of this.
a survey out right now.
It asks a bunch of questions, a lot about housing, and asks folks to rank priorities, including a section on transportation-related infrastructure.
But it's almost like Bike and Walk Salem didn't exist! Or that having a robust multi-modal transportation system doesn't make it easier to eliminate one or more cars in a household and to save a significant chunk of family budget.
Though there's a bit on sidewalks, mostly it suffers from the default autoist bias. It treats transit, bikes, and even walking as secondary mobility choices, not as central ingredients on a full menu.