Or is the situation actually begging for addition by subtraction?
Arbuckle Costic and Salem Downtown Partnership |
On Wednesday at 5:30pm, the Salem Downtown Partnership is hosting an open house and presentation on the greenway and streetscape plan. It will be the Grand Ballroom (4th floor), 187 High Street NE.
They'd like a count, so please email the partnership to RSVP.
Arbuckle Costic and Salem Downtown Partnership |
Some of the rhetoric around the project talks being a regional draw. This points to the one reservation I have. I hope the focus stays on the street and pleasant mobility for Salemites, and not on botantical tourism from afar. The streets should remain as a means, as a way to improve connections, and not viewed so much as an end, a tourist destination in and of itself.
The Salem Weekly article quotes Carole Smith:
Smith sees Salem as having an advantage similar to the city of Victoria, B.C., which benefits from the Buchart Gardens, the same distance (16 miles,) as The Oregon Garden is from Salem. ”Having major landscape downtown will draw some of the 80,000 botanical tourists who visit The Oregon Garden every year,” she says. “Once here, those tourists will sleep in local hotels, eat at local restaurants, buy gas and visit other attractions – just as they do in Victoria.”The Oregon Garden has constantly struggled and probably shouldn't be a model. If there's a tourist attraction to downtown, shouldn't it be related to the stock of historic buildings, and not a gardenified street? The whole "Lord & Schryver" angle also seems a little fussy and formal, too much modeled on European formal gardens and the aspirations of a provincial gentry from the last century, and not enough on a kind of Northwest urbanism for the 21st century. But perhaps the nod to the landscape and garden designers is just a catchy slogan rather than substantive borrowing.
Via Salem Weekly |
1 comment:
Lots of support for bikes last night!
Post a Comment