The tree in early May 2013 |
Streetview from June 2018 shows its decline |
The tree much smaller in 1911, detail (Salem Library Historic Photos) |
There is no permit referenced on the notice, and the City's database doesn't list a permit application, so apparently there is no formal process required to cut it down.
via Facebook |
In 1955 there were a couple more of them (Salem Library Historic Photos) |
The decline and die-off between the 2013 and 2018 images is clear, alas. It is not at all obvious that the City shouldn't go ahead and replace it, and this does not seem to be a case of the City carelessly arguing for tree removal. Still, it's a sad moment, and if you are out-and-about nearby, take a last stroll or ride under it soon!
Addendum, January 12th
Here is was yesterday, and very soon it will be totally gone! (But if the tree is diseased, the sawdust, larger debris, and log sections may not be adequately isolated. This does not look like careful tree removal hygiene.)
Only the trunk is left (January 11th) |
3 comments:
It may not be a Walnut! On FB arborist Elwood writes:
"Just went and looked at the tree it's not a walnut it's an oak and the tree has been in decline for a long time the tree is not at Willamette University it is on city right away property."
thanks for those old pictures of the Library. I used to wait for the City bus under those trees back in 1956 to 1964.
In their case I believe they had to go because the roots were actually pushing the wall over and probably pushing on the foundation of the building itself. But in this case, I do not think it is the case.
It is sad to see ones own life experiences be lost!
Added photo mid-removal.
Post a Comment